Nar Nar Goon North vs Pakenham Upper, VIC Suburb Comparison

Nar Nar Goon North for families; Pakenham Upper for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Nar Nar Goon NorthPakenham Upper

Overall score

Nar Nar Goon North

44.3/100

Pakenham Upper

62.0/100

Crime rate

Nar Nar Goon North

90.1 / 1k

Pakenham Upper

29.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nar Nar Goon North

3

Pakenham Upper

10

Population

Nar Nar Goon North

819

Pakenham Upper

1,196

Metric leadNar Nar Goon North 1Pakenham Upper 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNar Nar Goon NorthPakenham Upper
Overall score44.3/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)31.7/10051.6/100
Crime rate90.1 / 1k29.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops—13
Walkability0.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities310
Planning activity3038
Green cover11.5%17.3%
Population8191,196
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Nar Nar Goon North is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Pakenham Upper is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

On the data, Nar Nar Goon North is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Pakenham Upper answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Nar Nar Goon North sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Pakenham Upper.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pakenham Upper, while Nar Nar Goon North remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons