Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper, VIC suburb comparison

Beaconsfield Upper for schools; Pakenham Upper for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beaconsfield UpperPakenham Upper

Overall score

Beaconsfield Upper

56.0/100

Pakenham Upper

53.1/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield Upper

23.5 / 1k

Pakenham Upper

32.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield Upper

80

Pakenham Upper

4

Population

Beaconsfield Upper

2,997

Pakenham Upper

1,196

Metric leadBeaconsfield Upper 6Pakenham Upper 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfield UpperPakenham Upper
Overall score56.0/10053.1/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10091.7/100
Crime rate23.5 / 1k32.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves75
Public transport stops13
Walkability49.5/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities804
Planning activity9538
Population2,9971,196
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield Upper is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Pakenham Upper is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Pakenham Upper sits among greener hillside streets, while Beaconsfield Upper keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Beaconsfield Upper pulls ahead on parks and reserves and walkability, whereas Pakenham Upper is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Beaconsfield Upper if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Pakenham Upper for retirees and families.

Related comparisons