Beaconsfield Upper vs Clematis, VIC Suburb Comparison

Beaconsfield Upper for retirees and families; Clematis for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beaconsfield UpperClematis

Overall score

Beaconsfield Upper

61.3/100

Clematis

46.2/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield Upper

24.2 / 1k

Clematis

75.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield Upper

83

Clematis

12

Population

Beaconsfield Upper

2,997

Clematis

352

Metric leadBeaconsfield Upper 7Clematis 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfield UpperClematis
Overall score61.3/10046.2/100
Housing (desirability)41.4/10063.4/100
Crime rate24.2 / 1k75.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves71
Public transport stops—7
Walkability49.5/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities8312
Planning activity959
Green cover22.0%26.6%
Population2,997352
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beaconsfield Upper is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Clematis is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Beaconsfield Upper sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Clematis is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Beaconsfield Upper is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability; Clematis answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Beaconsfield Upper, while Clematis remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons