Beaconsfield Upper vs Clematis, VIC suburb comparison

Beaconsfield Upper for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beaconsfield UpperClematis

Overall score

Beaconsfield Upper

56.0/100

Clematis

24.2/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield Upper

23.5 / 1k

Clematis

106.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield Upper

80

Clematis

9

Population

Beaconsfield Upper

2,997

Clematis

352

Metric leadBeaconsfield Upper 7Clematis 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfield UpperClematis
Overall score56.0/10024.2/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10053.6/100
Crime rate23.5 / 1k106.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves71
Public transport stops7
Walkability49.5/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities809
Planning activity959
Population2,997352
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beaconsfield Upper is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Clematis is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Beaconsfield Upper sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Clematis is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Beaconsfield Upper is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Clematis answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beaconsfield Upper, while Clematis remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons