Overall score
Beaconsfield Upper
56.0/100
Clematis
24.2/100
Beaconsfield Upper for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beaconsfield Upper
56.0/100
Clematis
24.2/100
Crime rate
Beaconsfield Upper
23.5 / 1k
Clematis
106.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield Upper
80
Clematis
9
Population
Beaconsfield Upper
2,997
Clematis
352
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield Upper | Clematis |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.0/100 | 24.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.0/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.5 / 1k | 106.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 7 |
| Walkability | 49.5/100 | 10.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 80 | 9 |
| Planning activity | 95 | 9 |
| Population | 2,997 | 352 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Beaconsfield Upper is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Clematis is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Beaconsfield Upper sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Clematis is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Beaconsfield Upper is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Clematis answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beaconsfield Upper, while Clematis remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.