Overall score
Beaconsfield Upper
56.0/100
Officer
70.3/100
Beaconsfield Upper for retirees; Officer for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beaconsfield Upper
56.0/100
Officer
70.3/100
Crime rate
Beaconsfield Upper
23.5 / 1k
Officer
60.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield Upper
80
Officer
141
Population
Beaconsfield Upper
2,997
Officer
18,503
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield Upper | Officer |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.0/100 | 70.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.0/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.5 / 1k | 60.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | — | 55 |
| Walkability | 49.5/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 80 | 141 |
| Planning activity | 95 | 159 |
| Population | 2,997 | 18,503 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Beaconsfield Upper reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beaconsfield Upper tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Officer stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Beaconsfield Upper generally means more sought-after housing, while Officer leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Officer, while Beaconsfield Upper remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.