Beaconsfield Upper vs Officer, VIC suburb comparison

Beaconsfield Upper for retirees; Officer for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beaconsfield UpperOfficer

Overall score

Beaconsfield Upper

56.0/100

Officer

70.3/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield Upper

23.5 / 1k

Officer

60.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield Upper

80

Officer

141

Population

Beaconsfield Upper

2,997

Officer

18,503

Metric leadBeaconsfield Upper 4Officer 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfield UpperOfficer
Overall score56.0/10070.3/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10074.6/100
Crime rate23.5 / 1k60.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools17
Parks & reserves76
Public transport stops55
Walkability49.5/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities80141
Planning activity95159
Population2,99718,503
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield Upper reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beaconsfield Upper tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Officer stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Beaconsfield Upper generally means more sought-after housing, while Officer leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Officer, while Beaconsfield Upper remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons