Beaconsfield Upper vs Emerald, VIC suburb comparison

Beaconsfield Upper for retirees and investment; Emerald for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beaconsfield UpperEmerald

Overall score

Beaconsfield Upper

56.0/100

Emerald

56.1/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield Upper

23.5 / 1k

Emerald

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield Upper

80

Emerald

79

Population

Beaconsfield Upper

2,997

Emerald

5,890

Metric leadBeaconsfield Upper 5Emerald 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfield UpperEmerald
Overall score56.0/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10066.8/100
Crime rate23.5 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves77
Public transport stops26
Walkability49.5/10038.0/100
Nearby amenities8079
Planning activity95145
Population2,9975,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beaconsfield Upper is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Emerald is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beaconsfield Upper pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Emerald is the better pick for housing affordability and a larger local community. Beaconsfield Upper generally means more sought-after housing, while Emerald leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Beaconsfield Upper if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Emerald for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons