Clematis vs Emerald, VIC suburb comparison

Emerald for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClematisEmerald

Overall score

Clematis

24.2/100

Emerald

56.1/100

Crime rate

Clematis

106.4 / 1k

Emerald

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clematis

9

Emerald

79

Population

Clematis

352

Emerald

5,890

Metric leadClematis 1Emerald 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClematisEmerald
Overall score24.2/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)53.6/10066.8/100
Crime rate106.4 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops726
Walkability10.5/10038.0/100
Nearby amenities979
Planning activity9145
Population3525,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/108/10

Comparison summary

Clematis reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Emerald is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clematis sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Emerald is in a middle-ring position.

Clematis pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Emerald is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Clematis generally means more sought-after housing, while Emerald leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Emerald, while Clematis remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons