Cockatoo vs Emerald, VIC suburb comparison

Cockatoo for investment; Emerald for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CockatooEmerald

Overall score

Cockatoo

50.3/100

Emerald

56.1/100

Crime rate

Cockatoo

44.3 / 1k

Emerald

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cockatoo

6

Emerald

79

Population

Cockatoo

4,408

Emerald

5,890

Metric leadCockatoo 3Emerald 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCockatooEmerald
Overall score50.3/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)72.6/10066.8/100
Crime rate44.3 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1726
Walkability25.5/10038.0/100
Nearby amenities679
Planning activity108145
Population4,4085,890
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cockatoo is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Emerald is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cockatoo sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Emerald is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Cockatoo is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Emerald answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Choose Cockatoo if you are weighing investors; lean toward Emerald for retirees and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons