Overall score
Beaconsfield
72.4/100
Officer
70.3/100
Beaconsfield vs Officer, VIC suburb comparison
Beaconsfield for retirees; Officer for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BeaconsfieldOfficer
Crime rate
Beaconsfield
55.2 / 1k
Officer
60.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield
342
Officer
141
Population
Beaconsfield
7,267
Officer
18,503
Metric leadBeaconsfield 7Officer 4across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBeaconsfield
- Best for investmentOfficer
- Best for best valueOfficer
- Best for best schoolsOfficer
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Officer |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.4/100 | 70.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.4/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.2 / 1k | 60.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 55 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 342 | 141 |
| Planning activity | 83 | 159 |
| Population | 7,267 | 18,503 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beaconsfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beaconsfield pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Officer is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Beaconsfield sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Officer.
Choose Beaconsfield if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Officer for investors and value-focused buyers.