Officer vs Pakenham, VIC Suburb Comparison

Officer for retirees and families; Pakenham for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OfficerPakenham

Overall score

Officer

47.4/100

Pakenham

46.8/100

Crime rate

Officer

64.1 / 1k

Pakenham

81.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Officer

145

Pakenham

488

Population

Officer

18,503

Pakenham

54,118

Metric leadOfficer 6Pakenham 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOfficerPakenham
Overall score47.4/10046.8/100
Housing (desirability)49.8/10055.0/100
Crime rate64.1 / 1k81.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves624
Public transport stops55258
Walkability55.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities145488
Planning activity159494
Green cover12.9%4.4%
Population18,50354,118
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Officer is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Pakenham answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Officer the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pakenham.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons