Overall score
Officer
47.4/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Officer for retirees and families; Pakenham for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Officer
47.4/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Crime rate
Officer
64.1 / 1k
Pakenham
81.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Officer
145
Pakenham
488
Population
Officer
18,503
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Officer | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.4/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.8/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.1 / 1k | 81.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 55 | 258 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 145 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 159 | 494 |
| Green cover | 12.9% | 4.4% |
| Population | 18,503 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Officer is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Pakenham answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Officer the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pakenham.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.