Overall score
Officer
70.3/100
Pakenham
74.1/100
Officer vs Pakenham, VIC suburb comparison
Officer for retirees and families; Pakenham for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
OfficerPakenham
Crime rate
Officer
60.4 / 1k
Pakenham
84.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Officer
141
Pakenham
455
Population
Officer
18,503
Pakenham
54,118
Metric leadOfficer 4Pakenham 7across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Officer | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.3/100 | 74.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.4 / 1k | 84.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 55 | 258 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 141 | 455 |
| Planning activity | 159 | 494 |
| Population | 18,503 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Officer is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Pakenham answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and families may find Officer the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pakenham.