Overall score
Nar Nar Goon
39.1/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Nar Nar Goon for families and investment; Pakenham for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Nar Nar Goon
39.1/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Crime rate
Nar Nar Goon
68.8 / 1k
Pakenham
81.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Nar Nar Goon
0
Pakenham
488
Population
Nar Nar Goon
1,023
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Nar Nar Goon | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.1/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.7/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 68.8 / 1k | 81.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 258 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 35 | 494 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 4.4% |
| Population | 1,023 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Nar Nar Goon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Nar Nar Goon sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.
Nar Nar Goon pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Pakenham is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Nar Nar Goon sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Pakenham.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Nar Nar Goon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.