Nar Nar Goon vs Pakenham, VIC Suburb Comparison

Nar Nar Goon for families and investment; Pakenham for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Nar Nar GoonPakenham

Overall score

Nar Nar Goon

39.1/100

Pakenham

46.8/100

Crime rate

Nar Nar Goon

68.8 / 1k

Pakenham

81.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nar Nar Goon

0

Pakenham

488

Population

Nar Nar Goon

1,023

Pakenham

54,118

Metric leadNar Nar Goon 3Pakenham 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNar Nar GoonPakenham
Overall score39.1/10046.8/100
Housing (desirability)57.7/10055.0/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k81.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—24
Public transport stops4258
Walkability6.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities0488
Planning activity35494
Green cover0.1%4.4%
Population1,02354,118
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Nar Nar Goon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Nar Nar Goon sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.

Nar Nar Goon pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Pakenham is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Nar Nar Goon sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Pakenham.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Nar Nar Goon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons