Overall score
Garfield
49.4/100
Nar Nar Goon
42.5/100
Garfield for retirees and families; Nar Nar Goon for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Garfield
49.4/100
Nar Nar Goon
42.5/100
Crime rate
Garfield
41.8 / 1k
Nar Nar Goon
83.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Garfield
42
Nar Nar Goon
0
Population
Garfield
2,114
Nar Nar Goon
1,023
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Garfield | Nar Nar Goon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.4/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.4/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.8 / 1k | 83.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 4 |
| Walkability | 32.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 42 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 35 |
| Population | 2,114 | 1,023 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Garfield is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Nar Nar Goon is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Garfield sits among greener hillside streets, while Nar Nar Goon keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Garfield pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Nar Nar Goon is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Nar Nar Goon, while Garfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.