Overall score
Bunyip
50.3/100
Garfield
47.5/100
Bunyip vs Garfield, VIC Suburb Comparison
Bunyip for retirees and value; Garfield for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BunyipGarfield
Crime rate
Bunyip
37.9 / 1k
Garfield
44.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bunyip
41
Garfield
51
Population
Bunyip
3,131
Garfield
2,114
Metric leadBunyip 9Garfield 22 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bunyip | Garfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.3/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.2/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 37.9 / 1k | 44.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 5 |
| Walkability | 51.5/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 51 |
| Planning activity | 106 | 43 |
| Green cover | 4.1% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,131 | 2,114 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Bunyip reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Garfield is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Garfield sits among greener hillside streets, while Bunyip keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bunyip pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Garfield is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, plus a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bunyip, while Garfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.