Overall score
Garfield
47.5/100
Yannathan
43.3/100
Garfield for retirees and families; Yannathan for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Garfield
47.5/100
Yannathan
43.3/100
Crime rate
Garfield
44.6 / 1k
Yannathan
37.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Garfield
51
Yannathan
1
Population
Garfield
2,114
Yannathan
272
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Garfield | Yannathan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 43.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.9/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 44.6 / 1k | 37.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 30.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 51 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 6 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 0.1% |
| Population | 2,114 | 272 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Garfield reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Yannathan is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Garfield sits among greener hillside streets, while Yannathan keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Garfield pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Yannathan is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
Garfield suits investors and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Yannathan is the stronger match for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.