Garfield vs Tynong, VIC Suburb Comparison

Garfield for retirees and value; Tynong for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GarfieldTynong

Overall score

Garfield

47.5/100

Tynong

40.5/100

Crime rate

Garfield

44.6 / 1k

Tynong

69.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garfield

51

Tynong

11

Population

Garfield

2,114

Tynong

523

Metric leadGarfield 8Tynong 23 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarfieldTynong
Overall score47.5/10040.5/100
Housing (desirability)48.9/10041.0/100
Crime rate44.6 / 1k69.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops54
Walkability30.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities5111
Planning activity4326
Green cover1.6%1.2%
Population2,114523
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Garfield is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Tynong is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Garfield sits among greener hillside streets, while Tynong keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Garfield is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access; Tynong answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Garfield suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Tynong is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons