Cardinia vs Pakenham, VIC suburb comparison

Pakenham for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CardiniaPakenham

Overall score

Cardinia

27.0/100

Pakenham

74.1/100

Crime rate

Cardinia

153.2 / 1k

Pakenham

84.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cardinia

32

Pakenham

455

Population

Cardinia

342

Pakenham

54,118

Metric leadCardinia 2Pakenham 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCardiniaPakenham
Overall score27.0/10074.1/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10081.2/100
Crime rate153.2 / 1k84.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops258
Walkability0.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities32455
Planning activity5494
Population34254,118
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cardinia is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cardinia sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.

Cardinia pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Pakenham is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.

Retirees may find Cardinia the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Pakenham.

Related comparisons