Overall score
Cardinia
26.5/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Pakenham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cardinia
26.5/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Crime rate
Cardinia
162.2 / 1k
Pakenham
81.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cardinia
32
Pakenham
488
Population
Cardinia
342
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cardinia | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.5/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.5/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 162.2 / 1k | 81.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 24 |
| Public transport stops | — | 258 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 32 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 494 |
| Green cover | 0.3% | 4.4% |
| Population | 342 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Cardinia is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cardinia sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.
Cardinia pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Pakenham is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. Cardinia generally means more mid-market housing value, while Pakenham leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Cardinia remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.