Pakenham vs Pakenham Upper, VIC suburb comparison

Pakenham for value and schools; Pakenham Upper for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PakenhamPakenham Upper

Overall score

Pakenham

74.1/100

Pakenham Upper

53.1/100

Crime rate

Pakenham

84.3 / 1k

Pakenham Upper

32.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pakenham

455

Pakenham Upper

4

Population

Pakenham

54,118

Pakenham Upper

1,196

Metric leadPakenham 6Pakenham Upper 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPakenhamPakenham Upper
Overall score74.1/10053.1/100
Housing (desirability)81.2/10091.7/100
Crime rate84.3 / 1k32.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Parks & reserves245
Public transport stops25813
Walkability100.0/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities4554
Planning activity49438
Population54,1181,196
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Pakenham Upper is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Pakenham Upper sits among greener hillside streets, while Pakenham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Pakenham is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Pakenham Upper answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Pakenham generally means more mid-market housing value, while Pakenham Upper leans toward more sought-after housing.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Pakenham the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pakenham Upper.

Related comparisons