Overall score
Officer South
42.4/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Officer South for families and schools; Pakenham for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Officer South
42.4/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Crime rate
Officer South
50.1 / 1k
Pakenham
81.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Officer South
6
Pakenham
488
Population
Officer South
1,159
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Officer South | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.4/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 69.4/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.1 / 1k | 81.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 258 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 494 |
| Green cover | 2.1% | 4.4% |
| Population | 1,159 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 4/10 |
Officer South reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Officer South sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.
Officer South tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Pakenham stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Officer South generally means more sought-after housing, while Pakenham leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Officer South if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Pakenham for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.