Officer South vs Pakenham, VIC Suburb Comparison

Officer South for families and schools; Pakenham for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Officer SouthPakenham

Overall score

Officer South

42.4/100

Pakenham

46.8/100

Crime rate

Officer South

50.1 / 1k

Pakenham

81.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Officer South

6

Pakenham

488

Population

Officer South

1,159

Pakenham

54,118

Metric leadOfficer South 4Pakenham 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOfficer SouthPakenham
Overall score42.4/10046.8/100
Housing (desirability)69.4/10055.0/100
Crime rate50.1 / 1k81.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—4
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves124
Public transport stops3258
Walkability4.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities6488
Planning activity23494
Green cover2.1%4.4%
Population1,15954,118
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/104/10

Comparison summary

Officer South reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Officer South sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.

Officer South tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Pakenham stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Officer South generally means more sought-after housing, while Pakenham leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Choose Officer South if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Pakenham for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons