Koo Wee Rup vs Officer South, VIC Suburb Comparison

Koo Wee Rup for retirees and families; Officer South for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Koo Wee RupOfficer South

Overall score

Koo Wee Rup

41.1/100

Officer South

42.4/100

Crime rate

Koo Wee Rup

87.4 / 1k

Officer South

50.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Koo Wee Rup

68

Officer South

6

Population

Koo Wee Rup

4,047

Officer South

1,159

Metric leadKoo Wee Rup 4Officer South 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKoo Wee RupOfficer South
Overall score41.1/10042.4/100
Housing (desirability)52.3/10069.4/100
Crime rate87.4 / 1k50.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools3—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops23
Walkability47.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities686
Planning activity5123
Green cover2.4%2.1%
Population4,0471,159
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/109/10

Comparison summary

Koo Wee Rup is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, while Officer South is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Where Koo Wee Rup is shaped by the coast, Officer South offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Koo Wee Rup is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Officer South answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Koo Wee Rup sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Officer South.

Koo Wee Rup suits people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Officer South is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons