Overall score
Officer
70.3/100
Officer South
39.9/100
Officer vs Officer South, VIC suburb comparison
Officer for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
OfficerOfficer South
Crime rate
Officer
60.4 / 1k
Officer South
36.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Officer
141
Officer South
6
Population
Officer
18,503
Officer South
1,159
Metric leadOfficer 7Officer South 3across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Officer | Officer South |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.3/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.6/100 | 66.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.4 / 1k | 36.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 55 | 3 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 141 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 159 | 23 |
| Population | 18,503 | 1,159 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Officer is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Officer South is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Officer sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Officer South is further out with more breathing room.
Officer pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Officer South is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Officer generally means more mid-market housing value, while Officer South leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Officer, while Officer South remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.