Bayles vs Koo Wee Rup, VIC Suburb Comparison

Bayles for retirees and families; Koo Wee Rup for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BaylesKoo Wee Rup

Overall score

Bayles

37.5/100

Koo Wee Rup

41.1/100

Crime rate

Bayles

69.1 / 1k

Koo Wee Rup

87.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bayles

8

Koo Wee Rup

68

Population

Bayles

445

Koo Wee Rup

4,047

Metric leadBayles 3Koo Wee Rup 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaylesKoo Wee Rup
Overall score37.5/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)39.7/10052.3/100
Crime rate69.1 / 1k87.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops—2
Walkability0.0/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities868
Planning activity1251
Green cover0.9%2.4%
Population4454,047
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Bayles is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Koo Wee Rup is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone. Koo Wee Rup leans into coastal living, while Bayles feels more inland and suburban in character.

Bayles tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Koo Wee Rup stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability. Bayles generally means more mid-market housing value, while Koo Wee Rup leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Bayles if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Koo Wee Rup for families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons