Overall score
Beaconsfield
72.4/100
Officer South
39.9/100
Beaconsfield for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beaconsfield
72.4/100
Officer South
39.9/100
Crime rate
Beaconsfield
55.2 / 1k
Officer South
36.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beaconsfield
342
Officer South
6
Population
Beaconsfield
7,267
Officer South
1,159
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Officer South |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.4/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.4/100 | 66.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.2 / 1k | 36.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 3 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 342 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 83 | 23 |
| Population | 7,267 | 1,159 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Beaconsfield is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Officer South is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Beaconsfield sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Officer South is further out with more breathing room.
Beaconsfield tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Officer South stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beaconsfield, while Officer South remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.