Overall score
Mawson Lakes
61.6/100
Salisbury
58.9/100
Mawson Lakes for retirees and families; Salisbury for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mawson Lakes
61.6/100
Salisbury
58.9/100
Crime rate
Mawson Lakes
60.1 / 1k
Salisbury
190.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mawson Lakes
560
Salisbury
454
Population
Mawson Lakes
13,794
Salisbury
8,841
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mawson Lakes | Salisbury |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 58.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.8/100 | 49.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 190.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 61 | 63 |
| Walkability | 85.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 560 | 454 |
| Planning activity | 45 | 86 |
| Population | 13,794 | 8,841 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Mawson Lakes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Salisbury is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Mawson Lakes tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities, while Salisbury stands out for housing affordability and public transport access. On housing, Mawson Lakes sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Salisbury.
Mawson Lakes suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Salisbury is the stronger match for investors.