Parafield Gardens vs Salisbury, SA suburb comparison

Parafield Gardens for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Parafield GardensSalisbury

Overall score

Parafield Gardens

64.2/100

Salisbury

60.3/100

Crime rate

Parafield Gardens

46.5 / 1k

Salisbury

161.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Parafield Gardens

164

Salisbury

454

Population

Parafield Gardens

18,467

Salisbury

8,841

Metric leadParafield Gardens 6Salisbury 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryParafield GardensSalisbury
Overall score64.2/10060.3/100
Housing (desirability)74.0/10049.8/100
Crime rate46.5 / 1k161.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Public transport stops7363
Walkability76.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities164454
Planning activity15087
Population18,4678,841
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Parafield Gardens is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Salisbury is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Parafield Gardens tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Salisbury stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Parafield Gardens, while Salisbury remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons