McKail vs Willyung, WA Suburb Comparison

McKail for families; Willyung for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

McKailWillyung

Overall score

McKail

33.3/100

Willyung

35.2/100

Crime rate

McKail

50.0 / 1k

Willyung

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

McKail

10

Willyung

2

Population

McKail

3,970

Willyung

635

Metric leadMcKail 4Willyung 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMcKailWillyung
Overall score33.3/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.2/10045.2/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops4—
Walkability6.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities102
Green cover1.3%2.3%
Population3,970635
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, McKail is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, and Willyung is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

McKail pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Willyung is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Willyung, while McKail remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons