Medina vs Orelia, WA Suburb Comparison

Medina for investment; Orelia for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MedinaOrelia

Overall score

Medina

33.2/100

Orelia

34.2/100

Crime rate

Medina

59.7 / 1k

Orelia

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Medina

39

Orelia

70

Population

Medina

2,260

Orelia

4,535

Metric leadMedina 1Orelia 83 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMedinaOrelia
Overall score33.2/10034.2/100
Housing (desirability)51.4/10047.3/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1943
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities3970
Green cover9.8%23.8%
Population2,2604,535
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Medina reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Orelia is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Medina sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Orelia is in a middle-ring position.

Medina pulls ahead on relatively affordable housing and a multicultural community mix, whereas Orelia is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Retirees and families may find Medina the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Orelia.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons