Medina vs Orelia, WA suburb comparison

Medina for retirees and families; Orelia for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MedinaOrelia

Overall score

Medina

27.0/100

Orelia

33.9/100

Crime rate

Medina

6866.6 / 1k

Orelia

3122.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Medina

25

Orelia

50

Population

Medina

2,260

Orelia

4,535

Metric leadMedina 0Orelia 91 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMedinaOrelia
Overall score27.0/10033.9/100
Housing (desirability)10.3/10018.4/100
Crime rate6866.6 / 1k3122.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Parks & reserves47
Public transport stops1943
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2550
Population2,2604,535
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Medina reads as a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm; Orelia is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Medina sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Orelia is in a middle-ring position.

Medina pulls ahead on relatively affordable housing and improving crime trends, whereas Orelia is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Retirees and families may find Medina the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Orelia.

Related comparisons