Merrimac vs Robina, QLD Suburb Comparison

Merrimac for investment and schools; Robina for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MerrimacRobina

Overall score

Merrimac

53.3/100

Robina

58.8/100

Crime rate

Merrimac

42.5 / 1k

Robina

42.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Merrimac

74

Robina

518

Population

Merrimac

7,212

Robina

25,659

Metric leadMerrimac 0Robina 102 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMerrimacRobina
Overall score53.3/10058.8/100
Housing (desirability)60.5/10063.6/100
Crime rate42.5 / 1k42.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves5112
Public transport stops2192
Walkability55.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities74518
Green cover2.9%10.1%
Population7,21225,659
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/108/10

Comparison summary

Merrimac reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Robina is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Merrimac is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Robina answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Robina, while Merrimac remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons