Overall score
Merrimac
53.3/100
Worongary
40.3/100
Merrimac vs Worongary, QLD Suburb Comparison
Merrimac for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MerrimacWorongary
Crime rate
Merrimac
42.5 / 1k
Worongary
39.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Merrimac
74
Worongary
6
Population
Merrimac
7,212
Worongary
6,021
Metric leadMerrimac 8Worongary 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Merrimac | Worongary |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.3/100 | 40.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 42.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.5 / 1k | 39.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 16 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 24.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 74 | 6 |
| Green cover | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Population | 7,212 | 6,021 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Merrimac reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Worongary is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Merrimac sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Worongary is further out with more breathing room.
Merrimac pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Worongary is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Merrimac, while Worongary remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.