Overall score
Metung
37.2/100
Swan Reach
42.6/100
Metung for schools; Swan Reach for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Metung
37.2/100
Swan Reach
42.6/100
Crime rate
Metung
41.8 / 1k
Swan Reach
32.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Metung
2
Swan Reach
14
Population
Metung
1,899
Swan Reach
861
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Metung | Swan Reach |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.2/100 | 42.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.7/100 | 76.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 41.8 / 1k | 32.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 5 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 9.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 14 |
| Planning activity | 76 | 16 |
| Population | 1,899 | 861 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Metung reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Swan Reach is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Metung pulls ahead on parks and reserves and a larger local community, whereas Swan Reach is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Metung sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Swan Reach.
Households prioritising schools may find Metung the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Swan Reach.