Overall score
Swan Reach
42.6/100
Tambo Upper
30.1/100
Swan Reach for families and investment; Tambo Upper for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Swan Reach
42.6/100
Tambo Upper
30.1/100
Crime rate
Swan Reach
32.6 / 1k
Tambo Upper
35.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Swan Reach
14
Tambo Upper
0
Population
Swan Reach
861
Tambo Upper
325
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Swan Reach | Tambo Upper |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.6/100 | 30.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.7/100 | 27.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 32.6 / 1k | 35.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 9.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 5 |
| Population | 861 | 325 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Swan Reach reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Tambo Upper is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Swan Reach is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Tambo Upper answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Swan Reach generally means more approachable housing costs, while Tambo Upper leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Swan Reach suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Tambo Upper is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.