Millfield vs Paxton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Paxton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MillfieldPaxton

Overall score

Millfield

31.1/100

Paxton

37.2/100

Crime rate

Millfield

96.8 / 1k

Paxton

96.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Millfield

4

Paxton

14

Population

Millfield

1,282

Paxton

1,215

Metric leadMillfield 5Paxton 53 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMillfieldPaxton
Overall score31.1/10037.2/100
Housing (desirability)36.2/10054.7/100
Crime rate96.8 / 1k96.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops2714
Walkability30.0/10023.0/100
Nearby amenities414
Planning activity714
Green cover6.2%9.0%
Population1,2821,215
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Millfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Paxton is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Millfield pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Paxton is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Paxton, while Millfield remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons