Laguna vs Paxton, NSW suburb comparison

Laguna for schools; Paxton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LagunaPaxton

Overall score

Laguna

25.5/100

Paxton

36.0/100

Crime rate

Laguna

97.0 / 1k

Paxton

96.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Laguna

0

Paxton

13

Population

Laguna

310

Paxton

1,215

Metric leadLaguna 4Paxton 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLagunaPaxton
Overall score25.5/10036.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.8/10088.3/100
Crime rate97.0 / 1k96.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops2014
Walkability30.0/10023.0/100
Nearby amenities013
Planning activity113
Population3101,215
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Laguna reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Paxton is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Laguna tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Paxton stands out for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Laguna sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Paxton.

Households prioritising schools may find Laguna the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Paxton.

Related comparisons