Laguna vs Paxton, NSW Suburb Comparison

Laguna for schools; Paxton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LagunaPaxton

Overall score

Laguna

28.3/100

Paxton

37.2/100

Crime rate

Laguna

97.0 / 1k

Paxton

96.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Laguna

1

Paxton

14

Population

Laguna

310

Paxton

1,215

Metric leadLaguna 4Paxton 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLagunaPaxton
Overall score28.3/10037.2/100
Housing (desirability)46.0/10054.7/100
Crime rate97.0 / 1k96.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops2014
Walkability30.0/10023.0/100
Nearby amenities114
Planning activity114
Green cover0.0%9.0%
Population3101,215
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Laguna reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Paxton is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Laguna tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Paxton stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Households prioritising schools may find Laguna the better fit, while families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Paxton.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons