Paxton vs Wollombi, NSW Suburb Comparison

Paxton for retirees and families; Wollombi for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PaxtonWollombi

Overall score

Paxton

37.2/100

Wollombi

38.2/100

Crime rate

Paxton

96.7 / 1k

Wollombi

96.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Paxton

14

Wollombi

3

Population

Paxton

1,215

Wollombi

301

Metric leadPaxton 6Wollombi 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPaxtonWollombi
Overall score37.2/10038.2/100
Housing (desirability)54.7/10047.7/100
Crime rate96.7 / 1k96.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops1414
Walkability23.0/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities143
Planning activity144
Green cover9.0%0.7%
Population1,215301
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Paxton is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Wollombi is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Paxton tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, while Wollombi stands out for parks and reserves, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Paxton, while Wollombi remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons