Paxton vs Wollombi, NSW suburb comparison

Paxton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PaxtonWollombi

Overall score

Paxton

36.0/100

Wollombi

26.4/100

Crime rate

Paxton

96.7 / 1k

Wollombi

96.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Paxton

13

Wollombi

2

Population

Paxton

1,215

Wollombi

301

Metric leadPaxton 6Wollombi 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPaxtonWollombi
Overall score36.0/10026.4/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10051.3/100
Crime rate96.7 / 1k96.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops1414
Walkability23.0/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities132
Planning activity132
Population1,215301
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Paxton is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Wollombi is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Paxton tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Wollombi stands out for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. On housing, Paxton sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Wollombi.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Paxton, while Wollombi remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons