Mirrabooka vs Nords Wharf, NSW suburb comparison

Mirrabooka for retirees and families; Nords Wharf for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MirrabookaNords Wharf

Overall score

Mirrabooka

32.6/100

Nords Wharf

30.8/100

Crime rate

Mirrabooka

76.9 / 1k

Nords Wharf

55.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mirrabooka

6

Nords Wharf

21

Population

Mirrabooka

809

Nords Wharf

895

Metric leadMirrabooka 3Nords Wharf 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMirrabookaNords Wharf
Overall score32.6/10030.8/100
Housing (desirability)53.7/10038.7/100
Crime rate76.9 / 1k55.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops1025
Walkability15.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities621
Planning activity312
Population809895
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Mirrabooka is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, while Nords Wharf is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Mirrabooka sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nords Wharf is more regionally self-contained.

Mirrabooka tends to lead on housing affordability and overall desirability, while Nords Wharf stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Mirrabooka suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Nords Wharf is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons