Overall score
Mirrabooka
32.6/100
Nords Wharf
30.8/100
Mirrabooka for retirees and families; Nords Wharf for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mirrabooka
32.6/100
Nords Wharf
30.8/100
Crime rate
Mirrabooka
76.9 / 1k
Nords Wharf
55.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mirrabooka
6
Nords Wharf
21
Population
Mirrabooka
809
Nords Wharf
895
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mirrabooka | Nords Wharf |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.6/100 | 30.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.7/100 | 38.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 76.9 / 1k | 55.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 25 |
| Walkability | 15.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 21 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 12 |
| Population | 809 | 895 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Mirrabooka is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, while Nords Wharf is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Mirrabooka sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nords Wharf is more regionally self-contained.
Mirrabooka tends to lead on housing affordability and overall desirability, while Nords Wharf stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Mirrabooka suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Nords Wharf is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.