Caves Beach vs Nords Wharf, NSW Suburb Comparison

Caves Beach for retirees and beach lifestyle; Nords Wharf for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Caves BeachNords Wharf

Overall score

Caves Beach

48.2/100

Nords Wharf

46.0/100

Crime rate

Caves Beach

56.0 / 1k

Nords Wharf

55.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caves Beach

99

Nords Wharf

21

Population

Caves Beach

4,016

Nords Wharf

895

Metric leadCaves Beach 7Nords Wharf 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaves BeachNords Wharf
Overall score48.2/10046.0/100
Housing (desirability)45.8/10058.1/100
Crime rate56.0 / 1k55.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops5925
Walkability80.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities9921
Planning activity2112
Green cover0.5%0.3%
Population4,016895
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Caves Beach is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Nords Wharf is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Caves Beach leans into coastal living, while Nords Wharf feels more inland and suburban in character.

Caves Beach pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas Nords Wharf is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Caves Beach, while Nords Wharf remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons