Mirrabooka vs Westminster, WA suburb comparison

Mirrabooka for investment and value; Westminster for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MirrabookaWestminster

Overall score

Mirrabooka

53.9/100

Westminster

51.6/100

Crime rate

Mirrabooka

1372.4 / 1k

Westminster

1451.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mirrabooka

106

Westminster

58

Population

Mirrabooka

8,000

Westminster

7,042

Metric leadMirrabooka 7Westminster 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMirrabookaWestminster
Overall score53.9/10051.6/100
Housing (desirability)43.7/10033.5/100
Crime rate1372.4 / 1k1451.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1019
Parks & reserves104
Public transport stops6530
Walkability57.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities10658
Population8,0007,042
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Mirrabooka reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Westminster is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mirrabooka sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Westminster is closer to the city centre.

Mirrabooka pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Westminster is the better pick for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Mirrabooka the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Westminster.

Related comparisons