Moana vs Old Noarlunga, SA Suburb Comparison

Moana for retirees and families; Old Noarlunga for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MoanaOld Noarlunga

Overall score

Moana

35.7/100

Old Noarlunga

33.1/100

Crime rate

Moana

25.3 / 1k

Old Noarlunga

99.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Moana

72

Old Noarlunga

61

Population

Moana

3,316

Old Noarlunga

1,531

Metric leadMoana 7Old Noarlunga 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMoanaOld Noarlunga
Overall score35.7/10033.1/100
Housing (desirability)50.3/10067.7/100
Crime rate25.3 / 1k99.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves1—
Public transport stops1815
Walkability29.0/10038.5/100
Nearby amenities7261
Planning activity6526
Green cover1.3%0.4%
Population3,3161,531
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Moana reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Old Noarlunga is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Where Moana is shaped by the coast, Old Noarlunga offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Moana pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Old Noarlunga is the better pick for housing affordability, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Moana sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Old Noarlunga.

Retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools may find Moana the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Old Noarlunga.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons