Overall score
Morphett Vale
48.2/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Morphett Vale for families and investment; Pakenham for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Morphett Vale
48.2/100
Pakenham
46.8/100
Crime rate
Morphett Vale
55.9 / 1k
Pakenham
81.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Morphett Vale
325
Pakenham
488
Population
Morphett Vale
24,002
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Morphett Vale | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.2/100 | 46.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 77.5/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.9 / 1k | 81.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 132 | 258 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 325 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 348 | 494 |
| Green cover | 14.7% | 4.4% |
| Population | 24,002 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 4/10 |
Morphett Vale (SA) is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Pakenham (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Morphett Vale tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, while Pakenham stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Morphett Vale generally means more sought-after housing, while Pakenham leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Morphett Vale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.