Overall score
Mount George
56.2/100
Piccadilly
58.0/100
Mount George for families and investment; Piccadilly for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount George
56.2/100
Piccadilly
58.0/100
Crime rate
Mount George
10.2 / 1k
Piccadilly
7.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount George
5
Piccadilly
44
Population
Mount George
276
Piccadilly
405
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount George | Piccadilly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.2/100 | 58.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.8/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.2 / 1k | 7.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 6 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 11.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 44 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 4 |
| Green cover | 34.1% | 8.5% |
| Population | 276 | 405 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Mount George reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Piccadilly is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Mount George is stronger for housing affordability, tree cover and green space, and overall desirability; Piccadilly answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
Mount George suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Piccadilly is the stronger match for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.