Overall score
Mount Hunter
54.0/100
The Oaks
61.1/100
Mount Hunter for schools; The Oaks for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Hunter
54.0/100
The Oaks
61.1/100
Crime rate
Mount Hunter
22.9 / 1k
The Oaks
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Hunter
2
The Oaks
57
Population
Mount Hunter
749
The Oaks
2,982
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Hunter | The Oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.0/100 | 61.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 37.0/100 | 51.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.9 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 64 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 57 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 23 |
| Green cover | 2.6% | 11.9% |
| Population | 749 | 2,982 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and The Oaks is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Mount Hunter pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas The Oaks is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer The Oaks, while Mount Hunter remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.