Overall score
Mount Hunter
35.8/100
The Oaks
63.1/100
The Oaks for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Hunter
35.8/100
The Oaks
63.1/100
Crime rate
Mount Hunter
22.9 / 1k
The Oaks
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Hunter
2
The Oaks
56
Population
Mount Hunter
749
The Oaks
2,982
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Hunter | The Oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.8/100 | 63.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.3/100 | 66.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.9 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 64 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 56 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 18 |
| Population | 749 | 2,982 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and The Oaks is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Mount Hunter pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas The Oaks is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Mount Hunter suits families more clearly, whereas The Oaks is the stronger match for retirees and investors.