Mount Hunter vs The Oaks, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Hunter for schools; The Oaks for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount HunterThe Oaks

Overall score

Mount Hunter

54.0/100

The Oaks

61.1/100

Crime rate

Mount Hunter

22.9 / 1k

The Oaks

22.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Hunter

2

The Oaks

57

Population

Mount Hunter

749

The Oaks

2,982

Metric leadMount Hunter 1The Oaks 101 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount HunterThe Oaks
Overall score54.0/10061.1/100
Housing (desirability)37.0/10051.3/100
Crime rate22.9 / 1k22.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves15
Public transport stops1664
Walkability24.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities257
Planning activity623
Green cover2.6%11.9%
Population7492,982
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and The Oaks is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace.

Mount Hunter pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas The Oaks is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer The Oaks, while Mount Hunter remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons