Overall score
Brownlow Hill
50.7/100
Mount Hunter
54.0/100
Brownlow Hill vs Mount Hunter, NSW Suburb Comparison
Brownlow Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Brownlow HillMount Hunter
Crime rate
Brownlow Hill
22.3 / 1k
Mount Hunter
22.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brownlow Hill
15
Mount Hunter
2
Population
Brownlow Hill
384
Mount Hunter
749
Metric leadBrownlow Hill 7Mount Hunter 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBrownlow Hill
- Best for familiesBrownlow Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brownlow Hill | Mount Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.7/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.4/100 | 37.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.3 / 1k | 22.9 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 16 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 24.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 6 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Population | 384 | 749 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Brownlow Hill reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Hunter sits among greener hillside streets, while Brownlow Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Brownlow Hill pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Mount Hunter is the better pick for a larger local community.
Choose Brownlow Hill if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Hunter for families and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.