Overall score
Brownlow Hill
50.7/100
Theresa Park
53.6/100
Brownlow Hill vs Theresa Park, NSW Suburb Comparison
Brownlow Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Brownlow HillTheresa Park
Crime rate
Brownlow Hill
22.3 / 1k
Theresa Park
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brownlow Hill
15
Theresa Park
4
Population
Brownlow Hill
384
Theresa Park
600
Metric leadBrownlow Hill 3Theresa Park 53 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBrownlow Hill
- Best for familiesBrownlow Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brownlow Hill | Theresa Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.7/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.4/100 | 40.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.3 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 20 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 4 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 3 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Population | 384 | 600 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Brownlow Hill reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Theresa Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Brownlow Hill pulls ahead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, whereas Theresa Park is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community.
On balance, retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Theresa Park, while Brownlow Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.