Overall score
Mount Larcom
25.0/100
West Stowe
35.6/100
Mount Larcom for schools; West Stowe for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Larcom
25.0/100
West Stowe
35.6/100
Crime rate
Mount Larcom
42.3 / 1k
West Stowe
52.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Larcom
0
West Stowe
0
Population
Mount Larcom
332
West Stowe
391
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Larcom | West Stowe |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 25.0/100 | 35.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.5/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.3 / 1k | 52.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 332 | 391 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Larcom is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and West Stowe is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Mount Larcom sits among greener hillside streets, while West Stowe keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Larcom is stronger for a quieter safety profile; West Stowe answers with housing affordability and overall desirability. Mount Larcom generally means more approachable housing costs, while West Stowe leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Mount Larcom suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas West Stowe is the stronger match for retirees and families.