Overall score
Clinton
56.8/100
Mount Larcom
25.0/100
Clinton vs Mount Larcom, QLD suburb comparison
Clinton for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClintonMount Larcom
Crime rate
Clinton
52.8 / 1k
Mount Larcom
42.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clinton
54
Mount Larcom
0
Population
Clinton
6,170
Mount Larcom
332
Metric leadClinton 8Mount Larcom 1across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clinton | Mount Larcom |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.8/100 | 25.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.0/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.8 / 1k | 42.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 5 |
| Walkability | 49.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 0 |
| Population | 6,170 | 332 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Clinton reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Mount Larcom is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Larcom sits among greener hillside streets, while Clinton keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Clinton tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Mount Larcom stands out for a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Clinton, while Mount Larcom remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.