Clinton vs West Stowe, QLD suburb comparison

Clinton for retirees and families; West Stowe for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClintonWest Stowe

Overall score

Clinton

56.8/100

West Stowe

35.6/100

Crime rate

Clinton

52.8 / 1k

West Stowe

52.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clinton

54

West Stowe

0

Population

Clinton

6,170

West Stowe

391

Metric leadClinton 4West Stowe 3across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClintonWest Stowe
Overall score56.8/10035.6/100
Housing (desirability)57.0/10091.7/100
Crime rate52.8 / 1k52.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves10
Walkability49.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities540
Population6,170391
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Clinton reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; West Stowe is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Clinton pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas West Stowe is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Clinton sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in West Stowe.

Households prioritising schools may find Clinton the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer West Stowe.

Related comparisons