Mount Tarcoola vs Utakarra, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Tarcoola for retirees and schools; Utakarra for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount TarcoolaUtakarra

Overall score

Mount Tarcoola

36.5/100

Utakarra

31.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Tarcoola

132.8 / 1k

Utakarra

132.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Tarcoola

39

Utakarra

34

Population

Mount Tarcoola

3,257

Utakarra

1,467

Metric leadMount Tarcoola 9Utakarra 03 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount TarcoolaUtakarra
Overall score36.5/10031.5/100
Housing (desirability)51.7/10042.6/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k132.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools31
Weather (desirability)2.8/1002.8/100
Parks & reserves77
Public transport stops1915
Walkability28.5/10022.5/100
Nearby amenities3934
Green cover7.1%3.0%
Population3,2571,467
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Tarcoola is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Utakarra is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Tarcoola sits among greener hillside streets, while Utakarra keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Tarcoola is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability; Utakarra answers with housing affordability. Mount Tarcoola generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Utakarra leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Tarcoola, while Utakarra remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons