Mount Vincent vs Pelaw Main, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Vincent for value and schools; Pelaw Main for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount VincentPelaw Main

Overall score

Mount Vincent

44.1/100

Pelaw Main

30.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Vincent

106.4 / 1k

Pelaw Main

90.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Vincent

2

Pelaw Main

21

Population

Mount Vincent

380

Pelaw Main

1,080

Metric leadMount Vincent 3Pelaw Main 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount VincentPelaw Main
Overall score44.1/10030.5/100
Housing (desirability)54.2/10060.7/100
Crime rate106.4 / 1k90.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—4
Public transport stops1018
Walkability15.0/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities221
Planning activity46
Green cover13.9%40.6%
Population3801,080
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Mount Vincent reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Pelaw Main is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm. Mount Vincent sits among greener hillside streets, while Pelaw Main keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Vincent is stronger for housing affordability, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook; Pelaw Main answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability. Mount Vincent generally means more sought-after housing, while Pelaw Main leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Mount Vincent the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pelaw Main.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons