Mulbring vs Pelaw Main, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mulbring for families and value; Pelaw Main for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MulbringPelaw Main

Overall score

Mulbring

38.9/100

Pelaw Main

30.5/100

Crime rate

Mulbring

106.1 / 1k

Pelaw Main

90.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mulbring

8

Pelaw Main

21

Population

Mulbring

682

Pelaw Main

1,080

Metric leadMulbring 4Pelaw Main 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMulbringPelaw Main
Overall score38.9/10030.5/100
Housing (desirability)38.9/10060.7/100
Crime rate106.1 / 1k90.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops1918
Walkability28.5/10027.0/100
Nearby amenities821
Planning activity106
Green cover8.3%40.6%
Population6821,080
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/101/10

Comparison summary

Mulbring is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Pelaw Main is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm. Mulbring sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Pelaw Main is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Mulbring is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability; Pelaw Main answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. On housing, Mulbring sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Pelaw Main.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mulbring, while Pelaw Main remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons