Nambrok vs Tinamba, VIC Suburb Comparison

Nambrok for investment; Tinamba for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NambrokTinamba

Overall score

Nambrok

36.9/100

Tinamba

45.3/100

Crime rate

Nambrok

37.2 / 1k

Tinamba

21.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nambrok

0

Tinamba

4

Population

Nambrok

280

Tinamba

358

Metric leadNambrok 1Tinamba 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNambrokTinamba
Overall score36.9/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10064.0/100
Crime rate37.2 / 1k21.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops—1
Walkability0.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities04
Planning activity11
Green cover0.0%0.2%
Population280358
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

Nambrok is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Tinamba is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Nambrok is stronger for overall desirability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Tinamba answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. Nambrok generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Tinamba leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Retirees and households prioritising schools may find Nambrok the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Tinamba.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons