Narraweena vs Wheeler Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Narraweena for investment; Wheeler Heights for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NarraweenaWheeler Heights

Overall score

Narraweena

54.6/100

Wheeler Heights

59.7/100

Crime rate

Narraweena

26.4 / 1k

Wheeler Heights

16.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Narraweena

85

Wheeler Heights

42

Population

Narraweena

6,971

Wheeler Heights

3,232

Metric leadNarraweena 8Wheeler Heights 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNarraweenaWheeler Heights
Overall score54.6/10059.7/100
Housing (desirability)57.6/10042.4/100
Crime rate26.4 / 1k16.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools147
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops7127
Walkability48.0/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities8542
Planning activity269
Green cover6.2%3.7%
Population6,9713,232
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Narraweena is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Wheeler Heights is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Wheeler Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Narraweena keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Narraweena tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while Wheeler Heights stands out for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wheeler Heights, while Narraweena remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons