Oaklands Park vs Seacombe Heights, SA Suburb Comparison

Oaklands Park for retirees and schools; Seacombe Heights for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Oaklands ParkSeacombe Heights

Overall score

Oaklands Park

42.6/100

Seacombe Heights

49.3/100

Crime rate

Oaklands Park

276.7 / 1k

Seacombe Heights

14.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Oaklands Park

225

Seacombe Heights

29

Population

Oaklands Park

3,948

Seacombe Heights

1,549

Metric leadOaklands Park 5Seacombe Heights 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOaklands ParkSeacombe Heights
Overall score42.6/10049.3/100
Housing (desirability)52.5/10066.4/100
Crime rate276.7 / 1k14.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops2510
Walkability85.0/10015.0/100
Nearby amenities22529
Planning activity5615
Green cover10.8%7.5%
Population3,9481,549
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Oaklands Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Seacombe Heights is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Seacombe Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Oaklands Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Oaklands Park tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Seacombe Heights stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Oaklands Park suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Seacombe Heights is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons